<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 279 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205066</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed, with each party bearing their own costs, based on the decision in the Virdi Brothers case. The judgment reaffirmed the applicability of the circular by the Central Board of Excise and Customs regarding the excisability of air-conditioning plants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 279 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205066</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed, with each party bearing their own costs, based on the decision in the Virdi Brothers case. The judgment reaffirmed the applicability of the circular by the Central Board of Excise and Customs regarding the excisability of air-conditioning plants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>