<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 600 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205064</link>
    <description>Where duty-paid inputs taken on credit are not properly accounted for, reversal of credit or payment of duty may be required for the unaccounted quantity, and the differential duty demand with interest was upheld on that basis. A stock mismatch or shortage in records, by itself, does not establish clandestine removal without corroborative evidence, so penalty equal to the duty demand was found excessive and reduced. Partial relief was therefore granted to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 600 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205064</link>
      <description>Where duty-paid inputs taken on credit are not properly accounted for, reversal of credit or payment of duty may be required for the unaccounted quantity, and the differential duty demand with interest was upheld on that basis. A stock mismatch or shortage in records, by itself, does not establish clandestine removal without corroborative evidence, so penalty equal to the duty demand was found excessive and reduced. Partial relief was therefore granted to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>