<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 778 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205063</link>
    <description>A show-cause notice under central excise law was held unsustainable where provisional assessment had not been validly initiated by a written request, yet the notice purported to finalise such assessment without statutory basis. The notice was also treated as time-barred because it was issued beyond the limitation period and sought to reopen the same period and subject matter already covered earlier, with no valid ground for extended limitation. Non-supply of relied upon documents was found to breach natural justice, and the availability of an alternative remedy did not bar writ relief where the notice was patently without jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 778 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205063</link>
      <description>A show-cause notice under central excise law was held unsustainable where provisional assessment had not been validly initiated by a written request, yet the notice purported to finalise such assessment without statutory basis. The notice was also treated as time-barred because it was issued beyond the limitation period and sought to reopen the same period and subject matter already covered earlier, with no valid ground for extended limitation. Non-supply of relied upon documents was found to breach natural justice, and the availability of an alternative remedy did not bar writ relief where the notice was patently without jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>