<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 518 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205042</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed due to the appellants&#039; failure to rectify defects in the filing process despite multiple opportunities and directions to do so. The judge found the appellants lacked diligence in addressing the identified defects, leading to the appeal being deemed non-maintainable. A directive was issued for the Registry to inform relevant authorities to prevent similar issues in the future.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 518 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205042</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed due to the appellants&#039; failure to rectify defects in the filing process despite multiple opportunities and directions to do so. The judge found the appellants lacked diligence in addressing the identified defects, leading to the appeal being deemed non-maintainable. A directive was issued for the Registry to inform relevant authorities to prevent similar issues in the future.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>