<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 386 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205032</link>
    <description>Punjab &amp; Haryana HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s allowance of amounts paid for ESI contributions despite late deposit, following SC precedent that the omission of the second proviso to s.43B is curative and operates retrospectively from April 1, 1988. The HC held these payments could not be disallowed under s.43B and answered the question of law against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 386 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205032</link>
      <description>Punjab &amp; Haryana HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s allowance of amounts paid for ESI contributions despite late deposit, following SC precedent that the omission of the second proviso to s.43B is curative and operates retrospectively from April 1, 1988. The HC held these payments could not be disallowed under s.43B and answered the question of law against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>