<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 512 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205023</link>
    <description>A stay application seeking complete waiver of service tax demand and penalty based on Notification No. 6/2005-S.T. failed because the notification plea had not been raised before the original or appellate authority and no factual foundation supported it before the Tribunal. Total waiver of the demand was therefore declined. However, the Tribunal granted interim protection on the penalty and directed deposit of the service tax demand with interest pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 512 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205023</link>
      <description>A stay application seeking complete waiver of service tax demand and penalty based on Notification No. 6/2005-S.T. failed because the notification plea had not been raised before the original or appellate authority and no factual foundation supported it before the Tribunal. Total waiver of the demand was therefore declined. However, the Tribunal granted interim protection on the penalty and directed deposit of the service tax demand with interest pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>