<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 237 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205015</link>
    <description>Link charges paid to a non-resident for satellite and communication services required a fresh examination of whether the payment constituted royalty or fees for technical services under the Act and the DTAA before any TDS disallowance under section 40(a)(i) could be sustained. The Tribunal noted that the agreement and actual service model had not been properly analysed, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals). Interest disallowance under section 14A also required reconsideration because, where both own funds and borrowed funds exist, a presumption may arise that investments were made from own funds if sufficient such funds were available. The section 14A issue was likewise set aside and remanded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 237 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205015</link>
      <description>Link charges paid to a non-resident for satellite and communication services required a fresh examination of whether the payment constituted royalty or fees for technical services under the Act and the DTAA before any TDS disallowance under section 40(a)(i) could be sustained. The Tribunal noted that the agreement and actual service model had not been properly analysed, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals). Interest disallowance under section 14A also required reconsideration because, where both own funds and borrowed funds exist, a presumption may arise that investments were made from own funds if sufficient such funds were available. The section 14A issue was likewise set aside and remanded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>