<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 656 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205007</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The valuation of the property was determined at Rs. 42 per Sq. Mtr., and the exemption under Section 54F was denied due to non-compliance with the prescribed deposit scheme. The appeal was dismissed in its entirety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 656 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205007</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The valuation of the property was determined at Rs. 42 per Sq. Mtr., and the exemption under Section 54F was denied due to non-compliance with the prescribed deposit scheme. The appeal was dismissed in its entirety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>