<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 233 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204996</link>
    <description>Refund under Condition No. 51 of Notification No. 6/2002-CE could not be denied merely because the taxi registration certificate was produced later, so long as the vehicle was actually registered as a taxi within the extended period allowed by the notification. The condition was construed as requiring timely registration, not production of the certificate within the initial three-month period. The assessee remained bound to prove the date of registration and the genuineness of the supporting documents, and the authorities could verify the claim and evidence. On that basis, the refund claim was to be examined and granted on satisfactory verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 233 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204996</link>
      <description>Refund under Condition No. 51 of Notification No. 6/2002-CE could not be denied merely because the taxi registration certificate was produced later, so long as the vehicle was actually registered as a taxi within the extended period allowed by the notification. The condition was construed as requiring timely registration, not production of the certificate within the initial three-month period. The assessee remained bound to prove the date of registration and the genuineness of the supporting documents, and the authorities could verify the claim and evidence. On that basis, the refund claim was to be examined and granted on satisfactory verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>