<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 232 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204995</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to reduce penalties imposed on a manufacturer of electrical contacts under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the penalty reduction was dismissed as the penalties were rightly reduced under Rule 25, and the conditions for reduced penalties under Section 11AC were not applicable since Section 11AC was not invoked in the show cause notice. The Tribunal emphasized that the Commissioner (Appeals) could not exceed the show cause notice&#039;s scope in imposing penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 232 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204995</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to reduce penalties imposed on a manufacturer of electrical contacts under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the penalty reduction was dismissed as the penalties were rightly reduced under Rule 25, and the conditions for reduced penalties under Section 11AC were not applicable since Section 11AC was not invoked in the show cause notice. The Tribunal emphasized that the Commissioner (Appeals) could not exceed the show cause notice&#039;s scope in imposing penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>