<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 261 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204993</link>
    <description>The CESTAT dismissed the appeal challenging the Commissioner (Appeals) order regarding rebate of duty on exported goods, citing lack of jurisdiction under Section 35B(1) of the Central Excise Act. Despite the order being based on Sections 11A and 11AB, the Tribunal held that since the issue primarily concerned rebate of duty on exported goods, the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed due to jurisdictional limitations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 261 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204993</link>
      <description>The CESTAT dismissed the appeal challenging the Commissioner (Appeals) order regarding rebate of duty on exported goods, citing lack of jurisdiction under Section 35B(1) of the Central Excise Act. Despite the order being based on Sections 11A and 11AB, the Tribunal held that since the issue primarily concerned rebate of duty on exported goods, the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed due to jurisdictional limitations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>