<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 647 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204982</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the assessee&#039;s and the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete Rs.9,70,000/- and sustain Rs.2,85,000/- of the addition on account of loans, and to delete the addition of Rs.2,00,000/- on account of the gift. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proving the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions to discharge the burden under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 647 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204982</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the assessee&#039;s and the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete Rs.9,70,000/- and sustain Rs.2,85,000/- of the addition on account of loans, and to delete the addition of Rs.2,00,000/- on account of the gift. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proving the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions to discharge the burden under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>