<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 377 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204976</link>
    <description>The appellants sought waiver of predeposit of service tax and penalties for transportation of crude oil and warehousing services. The Tribunal found the appellants had paid appropriate service tax for the transportation, and the demand for storage services lacked merit. Consequently, the predeposit and recovery of taxes and penalties were waived, with stay granted during the appeal. The Vice-President of the Tribunal allowed the stay petitions, providing relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 17:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 377 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204976</link>
      <description>The appellants sought waiver of predeposit of service tax and penalties for transportation of crude oil and warehousing services. The Tribunal found the appellants had paid appropriate service tax for the transportation, and the demand for storage services lacked merit. Consequently, the predeposit and recovery of taxes and penalties were waived, with stay granted during the appeal. The Vice-President of the Tribunal allowed the stay petitions, providing relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>