<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 376 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204975</link>
    <description>Penalty under Sections 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was set aside because the assessee showed reasonable cause and bona fide belief within Section 80. The service tax was already paid with interest and the demand itself was not disputed; the controversy concerned only penalty. As the taxable entry had changed during the relevant period, including expansion of the category and substitution of wording, the assessee&#039;s belief that it was not liable was treated as reasonable. Penalty relief was therefore granted, while the service tax demand remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 376 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204975</link>
      <description>Penalty under Sections 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was set aside because the assessee showed reasonable cause and bona fide belief within Section 80. The service tax was already paid with interest and the demand itself was not disputed; the controversy concerned only penalty. As the taxable entry had changed during the relevant period, including expansion of the category and substitution of wording, the assessee&#039;s belief that it was not liable was treated as reasonable. Penalty relief was therefore granted, while the service tax demand remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>