<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 254 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204973</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by way of remand, with the Tribunal setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision and remanding the matter for reevaluation based on new evidence from the Software Technology Park of India. The stay petition was disposed of accordingly, and the appeal was concluded without the pre-deposit of duties, as agreed upon by both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 254 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204973</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by way of remand, with the Tribunal setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision and remanding the matter for reevaluation based on new evidence from the Software Technology Park of India. The stay petition was disposed of accordingly, and the appeal was concluded without the pre-deposit of duties, as agreed upon by both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>