<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 501 - ITAT, Hyderabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204963</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the quantum appeal (ITA No.456/Hyd/2009) challenging the addition of job work charges based on discrepancies, citing lack of merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions. The penalty appeal (ITA No.457/Hyd/2009) against the imposition of penalty under S.271B for not filing a tax audit report was allowed, as the tribunal found the appellant&#039;s genuine belief regarding turnover and lack of evidence from the Revenue to justify the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 501 - ITAT, Hyderabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204963</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the quantum appeal (ITA No.456/Hyd/2009) challenging the addition of job work charges based on discrepancies, citing lack of merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions. The penalty appeal (ITA No.457/Hyd/2009) against the imposition of penalty under S.271B for not filing a tax audit report was allowed, as the tribunal found the appellant&#039;s genuine belief regarding turnover and lack of evidence from the Revenue to justify the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>