<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 371 - ITAT, Cochin</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204959</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the additions and disallowances by the AO and CIT(A). The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the disputed amounts related to interest on excess drawings, interest paid to a partner, unexplained income under section 68, and keyman insurance premium. The stay petition was deemed infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 371 - ITAT, Cochin</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204959</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the additions and disallowances by the AO and CIT(A). The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the disputed amounts related to interest on excess drawings, interest paid to a partner, unexplained income under section 68, and keyman insurance premium. The stay petition was deemed infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>