<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 250 - CESTAT, Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204952</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the service tax liability under the reverse charge mechanism, setting aside the demands, penalties, and interest. The denial of cenvat credit issue was remitted back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration due to lack of findings, emphasizing the need to assess the evidence presented. Penalties imposed were also overturned, with instructions to ensure adherence to natural justice principles in the review process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 250 - CESTAT, Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204952</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the service tax liability under the reverse charge mechanism, setting aside the demands, penalties, and interest. The denial of cenvat credit issue was remitted back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration due to lack of findings, emphasizing the need to assess the evidence presented. Penalties imposed were also overturned, with instructions to ensure adherence to natural justice principles in the review process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>