https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204946 The judgment allowed the appeal, emphasizing the absence of intentional wrongdoing by the appellant and the lack of duty implications or licensing violations. The confiscation of goods and penalties imposed were deemed unjustified as the misdeclaration was attributed to a mistake by the inspection agency. The decision rectified the inadvertent misdeclaration issue by a third party, leading to the disposal of the Misc. application and relief granted to the appellant in accordance with the law. en-us Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204946 The judgment allowed the appeal, emphasizing the absence of intentional wrongdoing by the appellant and the lack of duty implications or licensing violations. The confiscation of goods and penalties imposed were deemed unjustified as the misdeclaration was attributed to a mistake by the inspection agency. The decision rectified the inadvertent misdeclaration issue by a third party, leading to the disposal of the Misc. application and relief granted to the appellant in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204946