https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204945 The judgment upheld the demand for cenvat credit and interest, as the appellant did not challenge these aspects. However, the penalty under Section 11AC was overturned based on the Tribunal's view that there was no intent to evade duty due to the existence of precedents supporting the admissibility of cenvat credit on the disputed goods. en-us Mon, 01 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Aug 2011 16:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204945 The judgment upheld the demand for cenvat credit and interest, as the appellant did not challenge these aspects. However, the penalty under Section 11AC was overturned based on the Tribunal's view that there was no intent to evade duty due to the existence of precedents supporting the admissibility of cenvat credit on the disputed goods. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 01 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204945