<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 776 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204932</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming that the assessee was entitled to benefits under sections 11 and 12 of the Income-tax Act. The investments in mutual funds were deemed compliant and aimed at enhancing resources for charitable purposes. The high frequency of transactions did not amount to a separate business activity. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 776 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204932</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming that the assessee was entitled to benefits under sections 11 and 12 of the Income-tax Act. The investments in mutual funds were deemed compliant and aimed at enhancing resources for charitable purposes. The high frequency of transactions did not amount to a separate business activity. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>