https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204928 The Revenue sought condonation of a three-day delay in filing an appeal, attributing it to interruptions in work. Respondents contested the delay timeline, arguing the appeal was time-barred. The Bench verified records and found the impugned order was received after the claimed date. Despite procedural errors, the delay was condoned, allowing the appeal. The cross objection was also resolved. The judgment was pronounced, settling the delay issues. en-us Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 May 2011 18:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204928 The Revenue sought condonation of a three-day delay in filing an appeal, attributing it to interruptions in work. Respondents contested the delay timeline, arguing the appeal was time-barred. The Bench verified records and found the impugned order was received after the claimed date. Despite procedural errors, the delay was condoned, allowing the appeal. The cross objection was also resolved. The judgment was pronounced, settling the delay issues. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204928