<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 406 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204909</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the tribunal directing the Assessing Officer (AO) to reassess certain issues. The tribunal allowed the deduction under section 10A for a new unit, treated as separate and independent. It also permitted the set-off of profit from the STPI Unit against losses from other units, considering section 10A as a deduction provision. Additionally, the tribunal allowed the deduction for miscellaneous income under section 10A, treated traveling expenses as legitimate business expenses, directed the AO to allow 60% depreciation on computer peripherals, and instructed a reevaluation regarding the delayed EPF payment and transfer pricing adjustment based on OECD guidelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 406 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204909</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the tribunal directing the Assessing Officer (AO) to reassess certain issues. The tribunal allowed the deduction under section 10A for a new unit, treated as separate and independent. It also permitted the set-off of profit from the STPI Unit against losses from other units, considering section 10A as a deduction provision. Additionally, the tribunal allowed the deduction for miscellaneous income under section 10A, treated traveling expenses as legitimate business expenses, directed the AO to allow 60% depreciation on computer peripherals, and instructed a reevaluation regarding the delayed EPF payment and transfer pricing adjustment based on OECD guidelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>