<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 755 - ITAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204907</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. It held that accumulation of income under section 11(1)(a) should be based on income computed on commercial principles rather than gross receipts. Additionally, it emphasized the need for condonation of delay by the Administrative CIT for the assessee to claim the benefit under section 11(2). The Tribunal supported the Assessing Officer&#039;s reliance on relevant case laws and found the Supreme Court decision inapplicable to the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 755 - ITAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204907</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. It held that accumulation of income under section 11(1)(a) should be based on income computed on commercial principles rather than gross receipts. Additionally, it emphasized the need for condonation of delay by the Administrative CIT for the assessee to claim the benefit under section 11(2). The Tribunal supported the Assessing Officer&#039;s reliance on relevant case laws and found the Supreme Court decision inapplicable to the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>