<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 244 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204854</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order confirming a service tax demand and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994, due to inadequate consideration of the appellant&#039;s arguments. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, allowing the appellant to submit additional evidence within 45 days. The Commissioner was directed to reevaluate promptly, preferably within six months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 244 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204854</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order confirming a service tax demand and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994, due to inadequate consideration of the appellant&#039;s arguments. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, allowing the appellant to submit additional evidence within 45 days. The Commissioner was directed to reevaluate promptly, preferably within six months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>