<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 470 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204850</link>
    <description>Imported sea shells classified under Heading 0307 were not restricted or prohibited under the Import Export Policy. Although wildlife authorities considered the goods covered by Schedules I and IV of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, importability depended on the applicable Import Export Policy conditions and restrictions. In the absence of a policy prohibition or restriction, the shells were not liable to confiscation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 470 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204850</link>
      <description>Imported sea shells classified under Heading 0307 were not restricted or prohibited under the Import Export Policy. Although wildlife authorities considered the goods covered by Schedules I and IV of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, importability depended on the applicable Import Export Policy conditions and restrictions. In the absence of a policy prohibition or restriction, the shells were not liable to confiscation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>