<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 341 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204844</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal against anti-dumping duty imposition. The applicants failed to provide sufficient cause for the delay beyond the three-week period set by the High Court, with the appeal filed late and incomplete. The Tribunal held that the Limitation Act does not apply to CESTAT proceedings, emphasizing compliance with High Court directives and the need for diligence in adhering to filing timelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 341 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204844</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal against anti-dumping duty imposition. The applicants failed to provide sufficient cause for the delay beyond the three-week period set by the High Court, with the appeal filed late and incomplete. The Tribunal held that the Limitation Act does not apply to CESTAT proceedings, emphasizing compliance with High Court directives and the need for diligence in adhering to filing timelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>