<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 761 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204830</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction to assess additional income beyond the reason for reopening, including short-term capital gains. The gains from the sale of land were deemed long-term, requiring bifurcation of consideration. The delay in filing cross objections was condoned due to the widow&#039;s lack of knowledge. Section 45(4) was applied to tax capital gains from the firm&#039;s dissolution post-amendment. Reassessment on different grounds was deemed valid. The AO&#039;s actions were mostly upheld, except for the treatment of land sale gains as long-term, which was remitted for correct calculation. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against non-taxability of capital gains was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 10:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 761 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204830</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction to assess additional income beyond the reason for reopening, including short-term capital gains. The gains from the sale of land were deemed long-term, requiring bifurcation of consideration. The delay in filing cross objections was condoned due to the widow&#039;s lack of knowledge. Section 45(4) was applied to tax capital gains from the firm&#039;s dissolution post-amendment. Reassessment on different grounds was deemed valid. The AO&#039;s actions were mostly upheld, except for the treatment of land sale gains as long-term, which was remitted for correct calculation. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against non-taxability of capital gains was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>