<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 491 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204827</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the appellants did not establish a prima facie case for a total waiver of the demanded amount. They were directed to deposit the balance service tax within eight weeks, while interest and penalties were waived for the stay application. The tribunal noted that the classification issue could be addressed during the appeal on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 08:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 491 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204827</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the appellants did not establish a prima facie case for a total waiver of the demanded amount. They were directed to deposit the balance service tax within eight weeks, while interest and penalties were waived for the stay application. The tribunal noted that the classification issue could be addressed during the appeal on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>