<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 331 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204820</link>
    <description>The case involved an appeal by the department against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the alleged less recovery of sugar during reprocessing in multiple sugar seasons. The department claimed a loss of 11,581 Qtls. of sugar during the reprocessing of 35,390 Qtls. of brown sugar and scrap sugar from 1999-2000 to 2003-2004. The tribunal rejected the department&#039;s appeal, citing previous decisions on similar cases and supporting the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). The cross objection was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 331 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204820</link>
      <description>The case involved an appeal by the department against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the alleged less recovery of sugar during reprocessing in multiple sugar seasons. The department claimed a loss of 11,581 Qtls. of sugar during the reprocessing of 35,390 Qtls. of brown sugar and scrap sugar from 1999-2000 to 2003-2004. The tribunal rejected the department&#039;s appeal, citing previous decisions on similar cases and supporting the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). The cross objection was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>