<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 330 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204819</link>
    <description>Excise duty could not be fastened on process loss arising during manufacture of copper cathode, because the permission for movement of semi-processed inputs was not intended to impose duty on such loss. The Board&#039;s circular was read as supporting the position that no duty liability arises on process loss. The condition in the permission letter was construed as covering only losses capable of being insured against, not invisible loss. On that reasoning, the duty demand and associated interest were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 330 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204819</link>
      <description>Excise duty could not be fastened on process loss arising during manufacture of copper cathode, because the permission for movement of semi-processed inputs was not intended to impose duty on such loss. The Board&#039;s circular was read as supporting the position that no duty liability arises on process loss. The condition in the permission letter was construed as covering only losses capable of being insured against, not invisible loss. On that reasoning, the duty demand and associated interest were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>