<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 665 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204809</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order in favor of the assessee. It concluded that the assessee was not required to deposit advance tax due to actual losses, thus not subject to interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C. The Court emphasized that imposing income tax on losses contradicts the concept of taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 665 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204809</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order in favor of the assessee. It concluded that the assessee was not required to deposit advance tax due to actual losses, thus not subject to interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C. The Court emphasized that imposing income tax on losses contradicts the concept of taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>