<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 324 - GUJARAT  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204803</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving Management Consultant Services. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on the limitation issue, remanding the matter for quantification. The High Court dismissed the appeal, agreeing that there was no suppression or intentional evasion of duty by the assessee, and no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 324 - GUJARAT  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204803</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving Management Consultant Services. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on the limitation issue, remanding the matter for quantification. The High Court dismissed the appeal, agreeing that there was no suppression or intentional evasion of duty by the assessee, and no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>