https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204801 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that filing two appeals against two orders-in-original disposed of in the same Order-in-Appeal was permissible under the law. The Tribunal cited the Ekantika Copiers case to support this decision. Additionally, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order based on Final Order No. 889/2007, following the direction of the Division Bench. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to legal procedures and complying with the law when filing appeals and addressing issues from previous orders. en-us Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204801 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that filing two appeals against two orders-in-original disposed of in the same Order-in-Appeal was permissible under the law. The Tribunal cited the Ekantika Copiers case to support this decision. Additionally, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order based on Final Order No. 889/2007, following the direction of the Division Bench. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to legal procedures and complying with the law when filing appeals and addressing issues from previous orders. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204801