<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 320 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204795</link>
    <description>The department&#039;s application to rectify an error in a stay order, seeking reversal of input duty credit and input service tax credit, was dismissed by the tribunal. The tribunal held that the application was not maintainable against a miscellaneous order and that the proposed rectification would have a negligible effect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 320 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204795</link>
      <description>The department&#039;s application to rectify an error in a stay order, seeking reversal of input duty credit and input service tax credit, was dismissed by the tribunal. The tribunal held that the application was not maintainable against a miscellaneous order and that the proposed rectification would have a negligible effect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>