<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 140 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204792</link>
    <description>ITAT, MUMBAI - AT held that for determining ALP on euro-denominated trade credit to an AE the CUP method cannot use AE-to-AE transactions as comparables; internal CUP comparables must involve the assessee and an independent party, while external CUPs are between independent parties. On the facts the tribunal allowed relief to the assessee on the ALP interest issue. The tribunal also upheld deduction under s.10A relying on precedent favorable to the assessee. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 15:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 140 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204792</link>
      <description>ITAT, MUMBAI - AT held that for determining ALP on euro-denominated trade credit to an AE the CUP method cannot use AE-to-AE transactions as comparables; internal CUP comparables must involve the assessee and an independent party, while external CUPs are between independent parties. On the facts the tribunal allowed relief to the assessee on the ALP interest issue. The tribunal also upheld deduction under s.10A relying on precedent favorable to the assessee. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>