<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 752 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204783</link>
    <description>The judgment concluded that Section 5 of the Limitation Act is applicable to appeals under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, allowing the High Court to condone delays. The legislative amendment to the Central Excise Act, empowering the High Court to condone delays, supports this interpretation. Excluding the power of condonation would prejudice litigants and lead to injustice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 752 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204783</link>
      <description>The judgment concluded that Section 5 of the Limitation Act is applicable to appeals under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, allowing the High Court to condone delays. The legislative amendment to the Central Excise Act, empowering the High Court to condone delays, supports this interpretation. Excluding the power of condonation would prejudice litigants and lead to injustice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>