<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 232 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204774</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decision to disallow CENVAT Credit on capital goods used in job work. Relying on a Larger Bench decision, the Tribunal held that credit cannot be denied based on the initial use of capital goods in exempted goods manufacturing. The Commissioner(Appeals) was directed to follow the binding nature of Larger Bench rulings, emphasizing that such decisions must be adhered to by lower authorities unless overturned by a higher appellate body.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 232 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204774</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decision to disallow CENVAT Credit on capital goods used in job work. Relying on a Larger Bench decision, the Tribunal held that credit cannot be denied based on the initial use of capital goods in exempted goods manufacturing. The Commissioner(Appeals) was directed to follow the binding nature of Larger Bench rulings, emphasizing that such decisions must be adhered to by lower authorities unless overturned by a higher appellate body.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>