<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 228 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204750</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of 9.533 MTs of war material but set aside the confiscation of the balance scrap and the penalty imposed. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s compliance with procedures and lack of knowledge regarding the objectionable material in the consignment, following established principles that absence of knowledge should not lead to penalties or confiscation of balance goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 228 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204750</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of 9.533 MTs of war material but set aside the confiscation of the balance scrap and the penalty imposed. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s compliance with procedures and lack of knowledge regarding the objectionable material in the consignment, following established principles that absence of knowledge should not lead to penalties or confiscation of balance goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>