<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 95 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204737</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that SCML did not have tax liability in India, and thus, the assessee was not obligated to withhold tax on payments to SCML. The Tribunal emphasized that the services provided were not sufficient to establish a business connection, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. This decision aligned with the source rule taxation principles and the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 95 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204737</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that SCML did not have tax liability in India, and thus, the assessee was not obligated to withhold tax on payments to SCML. The Tribunal emphasized that the services provided were not sufficient to establish a business connection, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. This decision aligned with the source rule taxation principles and the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>