<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 226 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204730</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the tax demands, interest, and penalties under Sections 75 &amp;amp; 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. However, the matter was remitted back to the lower appellate authority for reconsideration of penalties under Sections 76 and 78. The lower authority was directed to provide a reasoned order considering legal provisions and precedents to determine the quantum of penalties. The impugned order was partially set aside, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive review of penalties in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 226 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204730</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the tax demands, interest, and penalties under Sections 75 &amp;amp; 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. However, the matter was remitted back to the lower appellate authority for reconsideration of penalties under Sections 76 and 78. The lower authority was directed to provide a reasoned order considering legal provisions and precedents to determine the quantum of penalties. The impugned order was partially set aside, emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive review of penalties in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>