<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 474 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204719</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal rejected the appeal, holding the appellants liable to pay interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, on the price difference between original and final selling prices. The judgment clarified that interest is automatically chargeable without a specified time limit, dismissing the argument on limitation for interest demands. The decision was based on established legal principles and interpretations of Sections 11A and 11AB, emphasizing the mandatory nature of interest liability upon delayed duty payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 474 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204719</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal rejected the appeal, holding the appellants liable to pay interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, on the price difference between original and final selling prices. The judgment clarified that interest is automatically chargeable without a specified time limit, dismissing the argument on limitation for interest demands. The decision was based on established legal principles and interpretations of Sections 11A and 11AB, emphasizing the mandatory nature of interest liability upon delayed duty payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>