<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 472 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204717</link>
    <description>A recovery notice for outstanding dues under a penalty order was upheld where the dues were admittedly outstanding and the mistaken mention of U.P. Export Corporation did not invalidate the notice. A disputed claim that an appeal had been filed could not be resolved in writ jurisdiction, and the unchallenged penalty order continued to bind the firm; the partner remained jointly and severally liable for the firm&#039;s dues. For release of the original shipping bills and DEEC books, the Court declined direct writ relief and left the matter to the competent authorities, who were directed to decide any application expeditiously and in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 08:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 472 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204717</link>
      <description>A recovery notice for outstanding dues under a penalty order was upheld where the dues were admittedly outstanding and the mistaken mention of U.P. Export Corporation did not invalidate the notice. A disputed claim that an appeal had been filed could not be resolved in writ jurisdiction, and the unchallenged penalty order continued to bind the firm; the partner remained jointly and severally liable for the firm&#039;s dues. For release of the original shipping bills and DEEC books, the Court declined direct writ relief and left the matter to the competent authorities, who were directed to decide any application expeditiously and in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>