<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 191 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204700</link>
    <description>The judgment involved allegations against M/s. Unimin India Limited for evading excise duty on goods cleared for DTA by misdeclaring quantity, grade, and value. The court found evidence supporting the accusations, leading to the decision to set aside the impugned order and remand the matter for a fresh decision. The appellants were to be given a fair opportunity to present their defense, emphasizing the importance of upholding principles of natural justice in the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 191 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204700</link>
      <description>The judgment involved allegations against M/s. Unimin India Limited for evading excise duty on goods cleared for DTA by misdeclaring quantity, grade, and value. The court found evidence supporting the accusations, leading to the decision to set aside the impugned order and remand the matter for a fresh decision. The appellants were to be given a fair opportunity to present their defense, emphasizing the importance of upholding principles of natural justice in the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>