<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 582 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204685</link>
    <description>The High Court held that expenses incurred for convertible debentures should be treated as revenue expenditure, even if converted into shares later. Citing a Rajasthan High Court judgment, the court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision. The court found no merit in distinguishing between non-convertible and convertible debentures, emphasizing that the expenditure should be treated as revenue, not capital.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 582 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204685</link>
      <description>The High Court held that expenses incurred for convertible debentures should be treated as revenue expenditure, even if converted into shares later. Citing a Rajasthan High Court judgment, the court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision. The court found no merit in distinguishing between non-convertible and convertible debentures, emphasizing that the expenditure should be treated as revenue, not capital.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>