<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 457 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204672</link>
    <description>The judgment dismisses Shri Tejas Desai&#039;s appeal for non-prosecution and sets aside the penalties imposed on officers accused of facilitating fraudulent rebate claims. The court emphasizes the need for corroborative evidence and independent corroboration to uphold findings based on retracted statements. It questions the imposition of penalties solely on retracted statements and underscores the importance of considering statements in their entirety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 457 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204672</link>
      <description>The judgment dismisses Shri Tejas Desai&#039;s appeal for non-prosecution and sets aside the penalties imposed on officers accused of facilitating fraudulent rebate claims. The court emphasizes the need for corroborative evidence and independent corroboration to uphold findings based on retracted statements. It questions the imposition of penalties solely on retracted statements and underscores the importance of considering statements in their entirety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>