<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 615 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204663</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 8,04,944, ruling that the payment to Akbarallys Departmental Stores was commission under section 194H. The failure to deduct tax at source led to the application of section 40(a)(ia), resulting in the disallowance of the payment as a deduction. The Tribunal emphasized determining the true nature of the payment from the agreement and parties&#039; conduct, rather than the account description. The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 615 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204663</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 8,04,944, ruling that the payment to Akbarallys Departmental Stores was commission under section 194H. The failure to deduct tax at source led to the application of section 40(a)(ia), resulting in the disallowance of the payment as a deduction. The Tribunal emphasized determining the true nature of the payment from the agreement and parties&#039; conduct, rather than the account description. The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>