https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204657 The court declined to entertain the writ petition challenging the order of the 4th respondent regarding the return of confiscated goods and imposition of customs duty, redemption fine, and penalty. The petitioner's argument against the sale of goods before exhausting legal remedies was rejected, and the court found the levy of customs duty valid under the Customs Act. As the petitioner had not appealed to the Commissioner (Appeals) within the stipulated timeframe, the court dismissed the writ petition, advising the petitioner to pursue the appropriate legal remedy if dissatisfied with the order. en-us Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204657 The court declined to entertain the writ petition challenging the order of the 4th respondent regarding the return of confiscated goods and imposition of customs duty, redemption fine, and penalty. The petitioner's argument against the sale of goods before exhausting legal remedies was rejected, and the court found the levy of customs duty valid under the Customs Act. As the petitioner had not appealed to the Commissioner (Appeals) within the stipulated timeframe, the court dismissed the writ petition, advising the petitioner to pursue the appropriate legal remedy if dissatisfied with the order. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204657