https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204655 The Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondents not to enforce the original order of confiscation and penalty until the regular bench resumes in Kolkata or the stay application is processed. The Court found the petitioner's grievance valid due to the irregular sitting of the Double Member Bench, citing Yeshanand Filaments Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India. No costs were imposed, and the allegations against the respondents were not deemed admitted as the petition was disposed of at the admission stage. The Court also ordered the urgent provision of a certified copy of the judgment to the parties. en-us Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204655 The Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondents not to enforce the original order of confiscation and penalty until the regular bench resumes in Kolkata or the stay application is processed. The Court found the petitioner's grievance valid due to the irregular sitting of the Double Member Bench, citing Yeshanand Filaments Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India. No costs were imposed, and the allegations against the respondents were not deemed admitted as the petition was disposed of at the admission stage. The Court also ordered the urgent provision of a certified copy of the judgment to the parties. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204655