https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204652 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's order confirming the invocation of the extended period of limitation due to the suppression of facts by the appellant regarding the manufacturing of Ayurvedic medicines. The appellant's claim for S.S.I. exemption was rejected, and the matter was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for re-examination. The classification of goods as Ayurvedic Veterinary Medicaments was upheld by the Tribunal. Both the appeal and writ petition were dismissed, affirming the decisions of the adjudicating authority and the Tribunal. en-us Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 May 2011 15:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204652 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's order confirming the invocation of the extended period of limitation due to the suppression of facts by the appellant regarding the manufacturing of Ayurvedic medicines. The appellant's claim for S.S.I. exemption was rejected, and the matter was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for re-examination. The classification of goods as Ayurvedic Veterinary Medicaments was upheld by the Tribunal. Both the appeal and writ petition were dismissed, affirming the decisions of the adjudicating authority and the Tribunal. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204652